Jump to content

Catholic

2021 5 classification realignment

Rate this topic

Recommended Posts

Just throwing this topic out there because it is interesting to me and I assume many others on this board. The NCHSAA is strongly considering going to five classifications starting in 2021 and that creates some interesting conference ideas. Simmons has done a great job of projecting possible conferences for the realignment with split conferences included. One conference that sticks out to me, maybe because it'd involve us is the Catholic conference with some interesting players in it. Large travel times would be the name of the game in it. http://simmonsratings.com/realignment.htm 

 

Thoughts?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I've always thought it made more sense for South Point to be in a conference with Lincoln County schools than Cleveland and Rutherford County schools. At least as far as travel is concerned.  

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

It is definitely an interesting take on the process.  I know travel would be more ACR if this were to come to fruition.  We have been in a conference with McDowell and South Caldwell before.  When you add in that trip to Boone, then that is a different animal all together.

 

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I dont mind the 5A but I just dont see why you would take West Charlotte out of the Imeck and Put in East Meck because it dont make no sense n With all due respect to EM - They not good rn at Football n IMECK would be a killer for them 

 

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Maybe Mooresville needs to go back to the NPC so they can be competitive again. It makes no sense for them to be in the IMeck.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
13 minutes ago, 84k said:

Maybe Mooresville needs to go back to the NPC so they can be competitive again. It makes no sense for them to be in the IMeck.

No......NPC killed us in Playoffs!!!!!! i BEEN hearing they are trying to get a Iredell-Cabb. conference like Mooresville, LKN, Hickory Ridge, Al Brown, and such but again Non of those schools will get us ready for playoffs because if 5A comes, We will be 5A if not a very large 4AA 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

9 Split conference with 1 conference have 1 (3A) TEAM n rest is 2a so HOW will that work come playoff time? 

East Meck shouldnt be put in the IMECK

Some conference make sense, some dont and biggest thing TRAVEL time will be the biggest thing with 5 classes. 

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, BlueDevilsBiggestFan said:

I dont mind the 5A but I just dont see why you would take West Charlotte out of the Imeck and Put in East Meck because it dont make no sense n With all due respect to EM - They not good rn at Football n IMECK would be a killer for them 

 

 

He screwed that up.  East Meck would not be in that conference.  He has admitted that was a faux pas on his part.

  • Like 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Would like to see 2A, 3A, 4A have more schools than 91.  1A and 5A have less than 51.  I thought 46 for 1A and 5A adding three per 2A - 4A.  Think there will be a few new football playing schools on board by then which would bring up the numbers in 2A - 4A. 

  • Like 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
11 minutes ago, btango said:

He screwed that up.  East Meck would not be in that conference.  He has admitted that was a faux pas on his part.

Got ya didnt know that ..... Yeah like i said it doesn't make logical sense and EM is just bad so 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I am very curious to see where Union Pines finally lands, provided there are five classes.  Could be a 4A/5A split with the current Sandhills Athletic Conference schools.  Could be with the Cumberland County teams in a 4A Patriot Athletic Conference.  Could be another 4A league, with Lee County, the Harnett schools and a few of the Johnston County teams.  Heck, it's all a crap shoot!  Who knows what they want and what will work out best.   Would like to see some other models out there regardless of four or five classifications.  I just can't see six classifications happening.

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 hours ago, 84k said:

Maybe Mooresville needs to go back to the NPC so they can be competitive again. It makes no sense for them to be in the IMeck.

no thanks

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, moonpie said:

no thanks

Have u heard anything bout this possibly Iredell-Cabarrus conference? I dont like it in my opinion - i mean yes Al brown would be a great gate n all every yr but would Brown really get us ready for 4AA? **If we dont go 5A**** i think if Mooresville goes 5A - The Imeck is the only Option we have 

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
17 minutes ago, BlueDevilsBiggestFan said:

Have u heard anything bout this possibly Iredell-Cabarrus conference? I dont like it in my opinion - i mean yes Al brown would be a great gate n all every yr but would Brown really get us ready for 4AA? **If we dont go 5A**** i think if Mooresville goes 5A - The Imeck is the only Option we have 

Yes, they would. If they go 5a they really wouldn't do nothing.

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Mooresville will be right on the cutoff line for 5A whether it is 46 or 50 teams.  They are right there and seem to be growing.  A few more schools in Raleigh and Charlotte may help or it could hurt.  

 

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Way too many variables involved that no one knows the answer to.  Five classes?  How will they be divided up?  Evenly or offset and how?  

Once we know how they are going to break the conferences down it will be much more simple to work on.

 

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
On 10/23/2019 at 6:14 PM, BlueDevilsBiggestFan said:

What has AL brown done? 

They beat a pretty good Davie County team. The same Davie County team that beat Mooresville and just last week beat a power house West Forsyth team.

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 minutes ago, 71K said:

They beat a pretty good Davie County team. The same Davie County team that beat Mooresville and just last week beat a power house West Forsyth team.

I will say Davie been up and down n also it taken 2 days for Brown to win n also yall were trailing so will see what yall do later down the line! 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
57 minutes ago, BlueDevilsBiggestFan said:

I will say Davie been up and down n also it taken 2 days for Brown to win n also yall were trailing so will see what yall do later down the line! 

It’s “in”, not “n”. 

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 minutes ago, BlueDevilsBiggestFan said:

Actually N means "and"  And its a shorten version 

On 6/30/2009 at 10:50 PM, Chris Hughes said:

Proper Grammar Required

The forums here at CarolinaPreps.com require members to type with proper grammar at all times.  Slang and abbreviations are not acceptable forms of communication.

Go back and read the forum guidelines. I’m not saying this just to get on you, this is for the betterment of the community here. It’ll make you a better poster in the long run and you’ll be more respected if you  communicate more professionally.  
 

You care a lot about high school sports, and for that I respect and appreciate you, but you’re capable of much more if you’ll communicate more clearly.  

  • Like 4

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Would like to see more models of what various realignment scenarios in addition to what Mr. Simmons has put together (five classification model).  Maybe Mr. Simmons can come up with more models in the future reflecting the various scenarios that could happen with the realignment "monster."  👾

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
5 hours ago, ramheadbut said:

use the 20/20/20/20/20 model for crying out loud

How about using the Charter&Private/1A/2A/3A/4A model.  If that doesn't do enough to assuage the disparity between large 4A and small 4A, then have 6 classifications...but either way, the charters and privates/parochials need to have their own playoffs. 

  • Like 1
  • Thanks 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 hours ago, NWWatchdog said:

How about using the Charter&Private/1A/2A/3A/4A model.  If that doesn't do enough to assuage the disparity between large 4A and small 4A, then have 6 classifications...but either way, the charters and privates/parochials need to have their own playoffs. 

The issue on realignment is it is for all sports.  There is a good competitive balance in most sports with four classes.  
 

There are not enough charters to have their own football playoffs.  I do think they should play up one classification.

 

 

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
On 10/25/2019 at 5:44 PM, btango said:

The issue on realignment is it is for all sports.  There is a good competitive balance in most sports with four classes.  
 

There are not enough charters to have their own football playoffs.  I do think they should play up one classification.

 

 

I would respectfully disagree that there's a competitive balance at the 1A level (and it's creeping into the 2A level).  Check out the state champions from last year at the 1A level - between all men and women's sports all but 6 were won by non-traditional schools (charters or private parochials).  If there are not enough charters/privates to play FB then make them bump a classification.  For all other sports they need to have a separate playoff for them.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
On 10/25/2019 at 9:34 AM, ramheadbut said:

use the 20/20/20/20/20 model for crying out loud

Please not 20/20/20/20/20.

That's not going work. I assume you pull for a 2a or 3a or you wouldn't say that.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, NWWatchdog said:

I would respectfully disagree that there's a competitive balance at the 1A level (and it's creeping into the 2A level).  Check out the state champions from last year at the 1A level - between all men and women's sports all but 6 were won by non-traditional schools (charters or private parochials).  If there are not enough charters/privates to play FB then make them bump a classification.  For all other sports they need to have a separate playoff for them.

If you have read any of my posts regarding realignment you know that I think before they do the realignment they need to figure out how to deal with 1A sports.  Simple realignment is not going to help the issue as many of the charters have smaller enrollments and there are urban magnets, open enrollment schools, and the Parochial school(s).

For a recap, it is my opinion that 1A should be fir “traditional” schools that do not allow students that live outside the geographical school district to participate in sports.  There would be a few exceptions such as a parent teaches there or the student lived in the district through the first semester of their junior school year or the sibling rule.  

A lot of schools would flip out because they consider themselves “traditional” although they would not come close to meeting the above criteria.

The issue is what do you do with the “non traditional” schools?  Separate them fir playoffs with a “non traditional” playoff subdivision?  Move them up a classification which would move schools with 2A numbers down?

A lot of logistics to be worked out on that and I can tell you nothing is happening any time soon.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
On 10/23/2019 at 5:58 PM, 84k said:

Yes, they would. If they go 5a they really wouldn't do nothing.

I disagree big time, Mooresville & The Lake have both closed the gap in the I-Meck...

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I don't mind the 5 classifications, but just don't end up like Georgia. they have 7 classifications and with the exception of metro Atlanta, the teams outside of the metro area have some long travel times.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
On 10/23/2019 at 3:18 PM, 84k said:

Maybe Mooresville needs to go back to the NPC so they can be competitive again. It makes no sense for them to be in the IMeck.

Mooresville is not competitive? Their record may not show it but they have given every team in the I-Meck a run for their money. One more play goes Mooresvilles way during the Vance game, and Mooresville wins. If there was not a bad snap in the Hough game and the momentum changes to a potential scoring drive. Then they are 5-0 in the conference. Mooresville definitely needs to play good ball this week against West Charlotte and then really come out to play against Mallard Creek and former coordinator Robert Hellams. Mooresville gives teams something to worry about and prepare for. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Any changes should address Charters and magnets prior to classification. They have made a mockery of the association’s board of directors (who come from public schools). This statement is based on all sports. The absolute biggest issue is basketball with non revenue sports as well.

As privates and charters grow yearly we are becoming a segregated state much like the northeast of the country. The intention is economic based but drives the racial imbalance. 

  • Like 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I would put all the Gaston County 3A teams together, it’s what they would want anyway. So you’d have South Point, Forestview, North Gaston, Hunter Huss, Stuart Cramer and East Gaston. The Cleveland County schools and RS Central would go with North Lincoln and East Lincoln. 
 

But of this will be moot anyway when the new ADM’s come out.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
On 10/29/2019 at 7:39 AM, CMoney54 said:

Mooresville is not competitive? Their record may not show it but they have given every team in the I-Meck a run for their money. One more play goes Mooresvilles way during the Vance game, and Mooresville wins. If there was not a bad snap in the Hough game and the momentum changes to a potential scoring drive. Then they are 5-0 in the conference. Mooresville definitely needs to play good ball this week against West Charlotte and then really come out to play against Mallard Creek and former coordinator Robert Hellams. Mooresville gives teams something to worry about and prepare for. 

Don't give me all the IF every team can say that 😄. Seriously, I'm just giving my Mooresville buddys a hard time. I know they have be competitive in the IMeck. Mooresville is like Kannapolis when they are in that conference most years you know you are playing for 3rd place.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Geographically and enrollment wise I would like to see NC push pass the 5 classification threshold, maybe to a 6a. SC is a much smaller state (geographically, number of participating schools and overall enrollment numbers) and the 5a system works well there due to their size (no split conferences and only 1 champion per classification). While I understand geography is a huge issue in NC and a bear to be equitable to all, creating more than 5 classifications (technically there are 8 now for playoffs/championship purposes) would, in theory, help reduce the number of split conferences and create a fairer competitive balance within the state (you would no longer have a school playing in conference with teams with 700+ more students for example). More conferences could also allow for smaller conferences and thus more intriguing out of conference matchups because teams will be willing to and have to take more risks with scheduling or maintain geographically rivalries. So my main question is why stop at 5? 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, TM73 said:

Geographically and enrollment wise I would like to see NC push pass the 5 classification threshold, maybe to a 6a. SC is a much smaller state (geographically, number of participating schools and overall enrollment numbers) and the 5a system works well there due to their size (no split conferences and only 1 champion per classification). While I understand geography is a huge issue in NC and a bear to be equitable to all, creating more than 5 classifications (technically there are 8 now for playoffs/championship purposes) would, in theory, help reduce the number of split conferences and create a fairer competitive balance within the state (you would no longer have a school playing in conference with teams with 700+ more students for example). More conferences could also allow for smaller conferences and thus more intriguing out of conference matchups because teams will be willing to and have to take more risks with scheduling or maintain geographically rivalries. So my main question is why stop at 5? 

I like equitable to all but there are limitations to all options.  Have to meet a fine line in the middle and that seems very hard to accomplish.

Agree totally SC is a much more simple state to set up due to it geographical size and layout plus the number of schools but they battle, also.  There it is every two years which I think is needed in NC!

More classifications will most likely result in more split conferences or conferences with less teams.  Impossible to have the same amount of teams in conferences with more classes without having split conferences.  

There are not eight playoff "classifications" for any sport other than football.  I am ok with some form of subdividing or more champions in the playoffs but doubling it is too many.  Subdivided playoffs has built dynasties and the schools that are winning the small sub class would be in it to win it in a non subdivided playoff. 

I am hearing that the schools (ie coaches and ADs) are complaining about five classifications and are not supportive of the possibility.  Look back at my posts over the years and you will see a theme of everyone wants change and wants it to be better but when it comes time to make the changes the schools nix it.  

Eight years ago several options were put on the table for the upcoming realignment.  Davis Whitfield, the director at the time, felt that all options should be presented.  My favorite was football to be realigned separately from all other sports.  Six, five, four, and three classes were presented as options to look at.  Offset number of teams per classification were discussed.  Revamping the playoff formats (which I would like to see in football).  One thing that was a common theme, football coaches wanted to keep subdividing and all sports wanted more teams to qualify for the playoffs.

 

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

×