Singlet Change- Compression Shirt/Shorts Option
Posted 26 June 2017 - 03:35 PM
Any opinions on this either way?
Posted 26 June 2017 - 05:37 PM
Of all tyrannies, a tyranny sincerely exercised for the good of its victims may be the most oppressive. It would be better to live under robber barons than under omnipotent moral busybodies. The robber baron's cruelty may sometimes sleep, his cupidity may at some point be satiated; but those who torment us for our own good will torment us without end for they do so with the approval of their own conscience.â€
â€• C.S. Lewis
Posted 26 June 2017 - 11:09 PM
Just for curiosity-did they consider it too revealing or what was their objection? In any event, so long as there is no competitive advantage gained from compression underwear I can't see the difference.
The change has been discussed for decades but the old regime just didn't want change. The newest decade of coaches realized it was keeping kids away from the sport. There is no doubt it has stunted the sports growth.
I'll be following to see who makes an immediate change in uniforms as I would hope the coaches use the new rule to entice middle school kids and younger to gravitate to wrestling. We'll find out soon who is willing to adapt and who is not willing to adapt. I think you can do much more with a compression shirt to showcase the school. Those in the rules committee nationally have been out of touch with kids way to long.
Posted 27 June 2017 - 04:05 PM
Spoke with a young man that is working part time for me this summer. He was 3A state champ @ 170 several years back. I mentioned the new ruling. I was surprised in his response. He stated with out a doubt that more kids of all age groups would participate now because of the new two piece uniform rule. He said that in high school many kids would not consider wrestling because they had to wear a singlet. I never in all my years would have thought a singlet would stop someone from the sport. Time will tell if rule change will be a positive move.